Tuesday, May 29, 2012

How To Read Literature Like a Professor



Prompt 1
What is literacy? What does it mean to be a literate person? How does one become literate? What does a literate person do, know, think?



Hello, Everyone,
Now that you're thinking about literacy and your role as a reader, we'll be posting prompts on Professor once a week. Feel free to write your thoughts, experiences, and questions to the prompts as well as responses to your colleagues' comments. We hope you are enjoying How to Read Literature Like a Professor and the jumpstart it gives to academic reading. Blog away!







98 comments:

  1. Literacy definition in a dictionary is "an person with knowledge of a particular subject or field." While in "How to Read Literature like a Professor" own definition is "an person that haves knowledge of a certain area and expands it to make it grow." Basically with the combine definitions from each source it's saying that it's a person with intelligence of a certain area of subject.

    One can not become literate when one is already is. Meaning that everyone is a already is literate in they own special way because everyone haves intelligence of something that are quite unique at . Take a person that's really good at math or anyone by the matter of fact. The definitions made clear that literacy is a person with "KNOWLEDGE", "OF A CERTAIN OR PARTICULAR SUBJECT OR AREA." Proving the point that everyone is literate. Within a literate person's mind of the subject they are doing. What they are doing is finding out more hints or information ,but specially learning about that subject. Going towards what they think and know is basically the same thing with each literate person they wonder more about the area and learn more about it to gain more knowledge. :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jasmine,
      I love this expanced view and definition of literacy. I have come to believe in the last few years that there are unlimited types of texts; therefore, there must be unlimited types of literacies. For instance, both of my sisters are bold and excellent cooks--they have culinary literacy. Sadly, I am not well-versed in this. I read an article this past year about eco-literacy which deals with the issues of our environment--politics, economics, etc. The list goes on. You have broken a definition mold for yourself.
      Mrs. Mac

      Delete
    2. I really like your definition and thought of literacy. I also believe that everyone is literate in their own way, however I do believe that it is possible to become more literate. Even if a person is literate, their is always room for improvement in a literate person. For example, if a person knows how to cook, their skill set includes more than just cooking. This person has to be good at math in order to put the right amount of spice into a recipe. They also have to know how to follow directions and use the proper technique when mixing, stirring, etc. I believe literacy can always be built up and continued throughout a person's life.

      Delete
    3. In a way, I do believe that we are all literate in our own way. But, unlike you, I believe every single one of us is the same when it comes to literacy. We all have in common the raw form of it, the ability to read and write. Now, here's where I start to agree with you, we all take that basic form and turn it into something unique that pertains to us. We just work on what adjectives we want pinned on to it.

      Delete
  2. Literacy is the ability to read and write; however to me it also seems to mean to be able to read a text and be able to comprehend the hidden meanings/illusions the text pertains to. To be literate is to have knowledge as well even if it is not in literature, but being literate pertains to genres of literature. A literate person must be submersed in literary works. No person can be completely literate because no one can read every single piece of written text in the world. A literate person is someone who has read many literary works, but is also able to discover the hidden meanings behind the different images an author presents. Understanding the context of a piece of text is the key element—other than being able to read—to being literate.

    A person becomes literate by surrounding oneself with the knowledge and access to the knowledge of a specific subject. Reading different texts about a subject is one of the most common ways to become “literate” although it also helps to achieve the common meaning of the word that one reads a lot of literature, but as I said it is not the only meaning. A person can also become literate by involving themselves in activities which would benefit their knowledge of a subject. These are only a few examples of how one can become literate, but there are thousands of others, even just living can be an example of a way to become literate by experiencing life. A literate person generally knows more information about a subject than say another like myself for example: I am literate related to equine related terms and topics while I am not literate in terms related to quantum physics. It may be an extreme example but you get the point. A literate person also challenges what they experience in their readings and daily interactions. They allow others opinions and believes vanish and take a stance on what is being discussed without any major bias other than their own understanding. They also know when they know enough to take a stance on a subject or let it be explained to them. Overall, a literate person attains, and uses their knowledge on a subject to further their own understanding or to challenge other’s views.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amber,
      I fully agree that the path to literacy never ends, making it impossible for anyone to become “completely literate.” As one grows more educated, one constantly uncovers new knowledge and the thought process continues to evolve. Learning can only build upon previous knowledge, and because an education continues throughout one’s life, literacy will never reach a final stage. You also made a great point when you suggest that understanding is the key to becoming more literate. It is simple enough to read and write proficiently, but it takes considerable skill to be able to fully comprehend the subject matter and analyze it on a more profound scale. Literacy requires expertise that is only achieved through a deeper and more complex understanding of the surrounding world.

      Delete
    2. Amber,

      I can understand what you mean when you state "however to me it also seems to mean to be able to read a text and be able to comprehend the hidden meanings/illusions the text pertains to." because the term literate just seems like a term that has more to offer than simply being able to read and write. As in honors program we have been asked in the past to explain books that contain literary merit. It seems like it should mean more, when really the correct definition turns out to be so simple, meaning so little. Creating a newly formed opinion of the term literate.

      Delete
    3. Amber,
      I also agree with the path that literacy never ends, making it impossible to become "completley literate". As a person becomes older they are exposed with new knowledge which means everyday a person can become more literate then they were the day before. This is a process that can go on for a lifetime. I also liked the point you made when you stated "however to me it also seems to mean to be able to read a text and be able to comprehend the hidden meanings/illusions the text pertains to." Because if a texted is not understood one can not become literate on that topic.

      Delete
  3. Amber,
    Like Jasmine, you are seeing Literacy in a broad way. I think this is so important. I'm wondering if literacy and intelligence are getting mixed together here. I'm not sure what I think about connecting those too. It's funny, I guess human beings are their own text--trying to read ourselves and others is the hardest task! That would make a great title, though--Human as Text--Reading the Species!
    Mrs. Mac

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interpreting the proposed questions as a personal point of view, I condense literacy down to the single category of dealing with literature and the various philosophizing and analyses. Throughout my life, I’ve only ever clumped literacy with books and such, mostly due to context and similarities of “literacy” and “literature”. For me, I’ve always considered literacy to be the textbook definition of the ability to read and write, but by stopping and actually thinking about it, I realize that I consider literacy to encompass more than just awareness of what words say and how to reproduce them on paper. Literacy is a mindset. It’s the ability to look at a text and not run from the forest for fear of the trees. It’s the ability to understand what the words on the paper mean and judge them for their worthiness or lack thereof. It’s the ability to manipulate words into expressing thoughts and goals in a way that silently reveals their intent for others to understand and judge. It’s the ability to communicate with others, authors or peers or future audiences. Literacy is the mastery of words in order to enlighten others with one’s ideas or be so enlightened by another.

    A literate person can do this. He or she doesn’t have to be a prodigy, or even be smart. Anyone can be literate, if they try. An illiterate person may read a book and say, “I don’t like it. It sucks.” Yet a literate person might read the same book and exclaim, “I think the book is terrible. The author confused me and gave too many minor details while failing to flesh out the characters. The climax was weak and the ideas expressed were cliche and predictable. It was not worth my time.” Granted, most people--literate or not--would just say they didn’t like the book and maybe give an emotionally-biased retort when pressed, but this is merely an example. A literate person is capable of appreciating literature, and often the discussion of it. However, this is pretty much achieved solely through work, i.e., reading, reading, reading, and more reading, all the while formulating thoughts and opinions on the text whilst considering its value.)

    Literacy is relatively simple to gain when compared to countless hours in the weight room for sports or a year of hoarding paychecks to buy that smoking new car, yet may be much more difficult to master. Literacy requires constant work and practice, but its fruits are plentiful. It sharpens the mind and trains one in critical thinking, allowing them to pester their worlds with questions and analyses. Literate people look like every other individual you meet, but there’s one easy test to tell them apart. Hand a person a thick book. Literate people will not faint or run away. Instead, they will look at it, extrapolate its basic plot based on the cover, and then sigh at the hours they will spend reading it instead of doing other things, even as they reach out to take it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian,
      Your prose and wit kept me amused and engaged throughout reading your response. You are truly a gifted writer. I loved your analogy of literacy to weight lifting and fiscal prowess. Your delicate judgment in paragraph two details what I believe most of us have been thinking throughout our high school english class experience. I applaud you for taking the initiative and calling out those illiterate individuals who have been making ridiculous, uneducated, close-minded comments during class throughout our three years of high school. I could not have executed the voicing of such an opinion in the kind, unbiased way in which you did. Nevertheless, it's nice to not be alone.

      Delete
    2. I think you are right on the money, dude! I also thought of the literal definition of literacy at first and branched out from it when I wrote on this prompt. But there is one part I don't necessarily agree with you: I don't think being literate is a mindset, where you get in class and think, "Time to be literate!" and then go back to your normal mindset, unless you consider "mindset" as a constant state of mind. I think of it as more of a trained way of thinking, meaning it is always with you; you are literate and literate is you. This may be a little confusing, especially if you consider "mindset" a constant state, whereas I see it as a change of focus of the mind for a particular situation. This is sort of trivial, though, but boy it sure got me to thinking!

      Delete
    3. Wow Brian… “Literacy is a mindset.” I just love this. In fact this quote should be the quote for anyone who is trying to prove the worth of knowledge especially where literacy is concerned …”well of course you don’t understand it’s a mindset.” That all aside, I think that you really were able to define this complex term, in one category, excellently. Certainly to understand literacy so deeply especially in one aspect of the word is a great accomplishment.
      One other part of your response that struck me was when you said that anyone can be literate. I agree with this as well. Yet if you look because it is choice literacy does not always manifest itself through the masses. If you are stuck in mindset where intellectual literacy is not fully supported you don’t really get anywhere. Also, while as you said there is no room to be afraid in the pursuit of literary knowledge, I think we all should fear getting stuck in one aspect of becoming literate. There will always be room to gain knowledge and expand into different regions of enlightenment.

      Delete
    4. Brian, while your response is obviously that of extreme intelligence, I must encourage you to attempt approaching literacy in an entirely new direction. Literacy, both in its literal and more abstract definition, is an essential skill when one registers for AP Literature; I fully expect that of the students taking this class, all are exceeding literate in at least the former way. Yet many would feel out of place if they walked into class and were asked to solve a complicated math problem. Both literacy and numeracy are very important skills we use extensively in our day to day life. Yet I suggest that students tend to fall on a number line; some students have initial ability leaning towards or the other sides and can enhance both skills although the inclination largely influences the pleasure of enhancing them.

      Delete
  5. I may seem a little pretentious in saying so, but even though literacy is literally the ability to read and write with some sort of skill, I do think that thoughts and the thought process itself have a lot to do with just how literate a person is considered. Without being able to communicate what we know effectively, who's to say we know anything at all? It all comes from how we have perceived the information we've taken in and put to memory, which is directly fueled by thought. Granted, impromptu speaking and organized writing are two very different mediums for expressing ideas (and definitely require activity in different areas of the brain), but I believe the definition of a literate person is someone who is at least somewhat controlled in their ability to make sense of the world around them and is able to relay information to other people without things getting too terribly jumbled along the way.

    When I think of the word itself, I'm reminded of history's repeated attempts to keep certain groups illiterate. Though today we generally believe this is a bad move, it's easy to see what benefits could have been gained from keeping unruly people uneducated. Without the ability to read or write, information traveled at a much slower rate and must have often been inaccurate as well. Under this restriction, ideas between groups would theoretically slow to a halt, keeping people in their place far easier than if they were able to read or write. But did these groups stay silent for long? Not that I've traditionally been taught. Slowing the pace of concepts and ideas did not slow their potency in an able mind one bit, and this message has cropped up in our past enough for us to learn from the mistake. Knowing how to read or write doesn't make one any less intelligent of a person, which must mean that the true definition of literacy lies beyond communication itself and in something deeper and far more fundamental in ourselves.

    I don't think you can "learn" how to become literate in this respect. Who really knows what determines how well we understand what we experience, although maybe childhood holds some sort of an answer. I've always heard that you should never reward a child for reading, but they should see what they learn from what they've read as a reward in itself; and though I mentioned this in another post, I truly believe it's curiosity that separates the dim mind from the flourished, the chronically active from the chronically inactive, and that's something that cannot be taught either. (Encouraged, maybe, but not planted inside anyone's head from the start.) I've recently become very interested in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which names some of the differences in cognitive functions between human beings based on their preferences for making decisions/processing information, and it's generally accepted that some types are naturally more keen to seek out information while others are more sedentary in their desire to learn. Neither of these preferences are weaknesses, nor do they determine the capacity for one's intelligence; the key is in how you use and develop the ways your brain naturally works. But whether curiosity is the word I'm looking for or not, literacy in the sense of describing a well-rounded, communicative person is invaluable in our culture and in the quest for progress.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Abby,

      I really like how you describe literacy being one’s ability to directly convey their thoughts. I would agree with your statement about how, if one is not literate, they might come across as unintelligent or insane. I will admit I struggle with this, sometimes. For me, though, it’s not that I don’t get it what I want to say out, it’s that I have so much I want to say at times, when I start to explain myself, it comes out in an “informal” way. Another thing is that I get ideas along the way, and, not wanting to forget them, I try to add them into what I am saying, yet it doesn’t always make my sentences/speech flow. Thank you for putting my diagnosis into words. This is something I am incapable of doing myself.

      Dylan

      Delete
    2. Abby, I really like your definition of literacy as both comprehension and communication. Upon reading this prompt, my first instinct was to say that there wasn't a meaning to the word beyond the face-value definition of being able to read and write, but you and a few other people have put up a working definition I can get behind.

      You know we share an interest in the MBTI, but I think the point you brought up about one's natural inclination toward verbal communication is very interesting. Is my brother the ISTP less capable of being truly literate because he isn't particularly enthralled with the idea of verbal or textual communication? And if so, does that mean literacy is not such a universally necessary skill as the INFP writers among us would like to believe?

      Delete
    3. Though I've already filled my quota of comments, I couldn't help myself. What fun the MBTI brings :) How people work truly relates to almost every subject of thought, demonstrated in the fact that I can't stop myself from bringing it up all over the place.

      ISTPs use introverted thinking and extroverted sensing as their two functions (you already know this, but for the occasional commenter wandering about who glances at this reply, I feel I should provide some sort of explanation). Introverted thinking is all about internal logic, making sure A yields B in a way that makes sense, but can also lead to the denial of external data if it doesn't fit with the logic inside an ISTP's head. Just as introverted feelers have personal values, introverted thinkers have a sort of personal logic that they use to make decisions. Extroverted sensing is present-moment living, being a sensory junkie and occasionally scatterbrained. ISTP's are known as the Mechanics for their ability to immerse themselves in their physical environment and manipulate it using the logic inside their heads. In your brother's case, it could be very likely that he attacks what he's interested in at great speed (I believe both INTPs and ISTPs are known to hone in on one particular area of interest and develop it, which I suppose could be a sort of literacy if you look past the face-value definition, as you previously mentioned), but as for being truly well-rounded, that's probably more of an intuition trait: that ability to see the bigger picture and the importance of things that the ISTP may not fully be aware of or place value in.

      Literacy in the way we (you and I) tend to think about it may not be something an ISTP is necessarily concerned about. And from INFP to INFP, I think we can get very affronted if someone denies the fact that something is important if it's important to us, and it may become a very personal thing when it really shouldn't be (considering he's your brother and bickering may occur). But I believe I mentioned once that abstract concepts are as real to intuitors as the objects in front of them, and though there's both a greater capacity and drive within the intuitors' heads to learn and understand the things they don't quite know enough of (people, in my case, as demonstrated in this huge text post; colorblindness for you, the things that pique our interest but don't necessarily have practical application), sensors may see that kind of behavior as something unnecessary and time-consuming. So in the battle of the literacies... there really is no winner. Intuitors, especially INFPs, are going to gravitate towards the written word and other abstractions, while sensors, especially ISTPs, are going to gravitate towards things that yield tangible, physical results. Point being: we will never fully understand each other- people can argue that it's just a brother and sister thing, it's a girl/guy thing, etc., but I really do believe it has a lot to do with how each person is individually wired.

      (This entire response relies on the fact that I'm considering literacy as a sort of cumulative understanding and not necessarily with words, numbers, etc. and not just within its definition as a language term.)

      Delete
    4. Abby, and, to an extent, Katie, although I been very initially resist to the idea of submitting and categorizing people or characters into a sort of prototype from which they can further extend, I'm becoming more and more drawn to it as an analysis tool. The subject remains continuously taunting and, as Abby said, applicable. As Katie has said in our conversations before, it's entirely possible for one to change types over time. Although I've had very little time to complete any background research, is it not possible, if you slowly developed these literacy skills, to slowly transform into another type, who was able to view the world, or a story, more abstractly than previously? In which case, it would affect the discussion resulting from Katie's question.

      Delete
  6. Abby,
    It's interesting that "curiosity" is becoming a thread throughout the comments. Most people want to know, and, for better or worse, curiosity is the driving force. Literacy is certainly in its most basic and traditional meaning the ability to read and write. However, I agree it's much more. The ability to think about what you read in order to write or speak about it moves literacy from the act of reading to cogently making meaning, infering, and drawing conclusions. That's one reason being a literate person is essential to readiness for the world beyond the classroom and is crucial in all disciplines.
    Returning for moment to your point about society trying to limit or control literacy. What better way to subdue people than to become their only source of information? After the masses began reading, they naturally began thinking about what they read. That same process, at it's essence, is what we build on with every new text. How can you not love it? It's a matter so basic yet so grander than we.
    SBL

    ReplyDelete
  7. Generally, when one thinks of literacy, the ability to read and write rises to the forefront of the mind, but in reality, literacy is much more. Directly after birth, we become literate. How so? We cry. We see. We hear. We smell. We feel. In crying, we express ourselves. By seeing, we learn of our surroundings. Hearing and smelling teach us of things we can't see. Through feeling, we learn of pain, texture, heat, etc. So what about this suddenly makes us literate? Think about it. Reading and writing serve as pathways to two major parts of life: knowledge and expression. Literacy is the ability to learn and to express what is learned. To be literate is to be human.

    Babies can't truly express themselves though...to us. They cry and flail their limbs in nearly every situation so their expressions are nearly always lost on us, but the expressions are still there. They use all that they know to attempt to get a message ("feed me!" "change me!" "ouch!") across. That's literacy. Granted, it's a very basic form due to the short time they have been walking literacy's path, but it's still literacy.

    Throughout history, oppressed groups in different periods (Africans, women, etc.) have been kept from information and made to be "illiterate". A better expression would have been "less literate", however, because the groups still had knowledge and expressed it whether via tending the fields, homemaking, or even interacting with each other. They still traveled the path. They simply met a roadblock and had to take a detour which shaped their thoughts, actions, and beliefs.

    Even today people wishing to expand their literacy meet roadblocks and detours. Someone who can't sit still long enough to read most books can reroute to find information and stories within more active pursuits (conversations, internships, jobs). Someone who loves information but not movement may veer off toward television. Someone who wants to control and shape the story may resort to writing stories or playing video games. Every preference and opinion cause certain detours along the trail. These detours are what shape personality and make a person into an individual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe you've made an interesting point about the definition of literacy. You see it as a definition of being human rather than a sign of intelligence. Most people, including myself, don't see babies as literate people, but it makes sense: literacy really is being knowledgeable, able to learn, and able to express what we think and feel to others in the best way possible. Babies can only do so much to tell us what's up, those poor things, but they are very much able to learn and let us know, rather loudly, that they want something. It makes sense to say "less literate" or "more literate" as opposed to "illiterate" because the latter implies no ability to learn or express, which for humans is absolutely not true.

      Delete
    2. I think that it's natural for someone on this blog to compare their posts to others, and now I see that ours aren't very similar, and yet, I think you make very valid points across the board as far as literacy is concerned. I've never thought about the development of literacy without proper schooling or an education. I do mention the importance of home-taught literacy in my post, but I see now that for the greater part of the world, home-taught literacy is the only literacy. I agree with Maggie that using the expression "less literate" is definitely more accurate that "illiterate" in that we are all "less literate" than someone else on some level. I think that mindset goes hand-in-hand with a phrase that runners hear a lot, that there is always going to be someone faster than you out there. It just goes to show that everyone has a lot to learn.

      Delete
    3. Chandler,
      As I read through your passage I was thoroughly intrigued, though I find myself disagreeing with you. You ended your opening paragraph by stating that “to be literate is to be human,” after using the example of infants embracing their senses and reacting to them. I do not find that to be a quality that is specific to humans; it is a quality that you will find in the entirety of the Animal Kingdom. All living things, except for bacterium and the like, react to their developing senses at birth. That does not make them literate, nor does it make us literate.

      Delete
    4. Had I read your post before writing mine, I would have thrown mine away (metaphorically, of course; this is a computer). You've said exactly what I tried to communicate and done it more effectively to boot. It would seem that you have a strong grasp on literacy, both its definition and its practice. You mentioned that oppressed peoples have been made to be "less literate" in order to keep them more oppressed and simple-minded. It seems to me that a person who can read and write does seem to see the world differently, but I wonder if they see it better than those who can read and write. As you mentioned, less literate people find other means of experiencing the communication they otherwise lost. Perhaps these people have a unique perspective they can share; perhaps a perspective born in a mind without writing or reading is more informed than the other. It seems like you were getting at that toward the end, but I still find it difficult to imagine a world without writing or reading.

      Delete
    5. Chandler,
      I really like your definition of literacy. Just as Ben said, had I read your post first I would have re-thought my own, because you raise an interesting point. I limited one's literacy to given fields, but you expanded it to include everything (quite literally). Unless I'm mistaken, you're saying that every person is literate in life itself, to one degree or another. I was also intrigued by your point about the oppressed being made "less literate," and it calls to mind Orwell's 1984, specifically Newspeak. I think that I can sum up my feelings with two words: Well said.

      Delete
  8. Hi Chandler,
    I love your discussion here. I'm wondering if there's yet another definition--not so much "less" literate, as "different" literate. Our experiences shape the kinds of literacies we possess. School really only develops a very limited kind of literacy if you think about it.
    Mac

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have found literacy to be more than just the ability to read and write. To me, literacy is interpretation through emotional and intellectual proficiency. Reading is not literacy. Simply knowing how to verbally communicate the sounds the many combinations of consonants and vowels make is just the start. Anyone can merely read, but many cannot begin to comprehend the minute rhetorical genius of an author like Steinbeck or Hemingway. Their straightforward, yet complex prose a requires true literacy. That is, they require the capacity to not only read the words, but also the capacity to relate and appreciate the adept eloquence with which they tell their stories. Literacy is a complicated cerebral function. It requires life experience to be literate. Relating to a piece requires living through a similar event, whether that event be the death of a loved one or simply the pleasures one has experienced when taking a bite of an apple.

    To be literate is to have lived and read. To become literate, one must read veraciously. They should read not just a few genres of writing, but every genre of writing. They must write often. They must experience life and what it has to offer. They must to converse and make new connections with all sorts of people. A literate person is open to new ideas. They can appreciate the works all types of writing. They are do not dogmatically believe in one philosophy, therefore a literate individual is not easily offended. They are open and considerate to new ideas and opinions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Evan,
      As always, I am impressed with how you present your perspective and I strongly agree that being literate is primarily focused on comprehension, application, and interpretation. However, it appears that in a society where the literate "should read not just a few genres of writing, but every genre of writing," would be a major gap between the literate and illiterate. I understand that you were not prompted to provide the definition of illiteracy, but say if one appreciated the art of literacy and extracted the author's claim but did not read "veraciously," would that person be considered illiterate? Only few people in society would be considered "literate" based upon your assertions.

      Delete
    2. You assert that literacy comes from experiencing life; that one cannot relate to a piece unless he has had a similar experience. While having an experience similar to one in a book may make the book have more significance to the reader, the job of the writer is not to share the experience with everyone, not just those who have experienced something already. Reading is often said to open our eyes to different worlds we have never before known. Being literate allows us to experience those things without them happening in our own lives. Literacy shows us that there are experiences other than the ones we know in our own lives. It allows us to see the world from a different perspective and question our own.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  10. Evan,
    I think your statement, "To be literate is to have lived and read," speaks to the application of literature to the human experience. Several comments mention the different types of literacy and specific types of reading that accomplish the purpose of each. At the core, literacy is reading, understanding, applying, and communicating the life lessons gained from text of any kind. What a waste to read great ideas expressed through artistic writing if there is no impact on the reader!
    SBL

    ReplyDelete
  11. To me, literacy is the ability to think, speak, and write properly in one form or another. I think it is also possible to be literate in many different ways and that literacy expands into many different fields and forms. For example, someone can be computer literate, meaning they understand computer jargon. I, personally, am theatrically literate. I understand the stage and what everything about it means, whereas many others may not. I however, am not sports literate (at all). Being a literate person doesn’t only apply to textbook knowledge of how to read and write, it applies to so much more.
    Since there are many different types of literacy, I don’t think that someone can be called “illiterate” flat out. No matter how stupid someone may seem, there has to be some form of literacy he or she understands that many others do not. Let’s use drug dealers as an example. Due to the fact that they have most likely spent many of their years high and/or drunk, many people think that drug dealers are illiterate. This is not necessarily true. While said drug dealer may not understand proper English, how to read and write, or know grammar (which is technically the definition of literacy), he knows something about drugs that non drug users do not. He may also have street smarts and know how to get himself out of a sticky situation; something I lack. Therefore, I am not “street” literate.
    As for becoming literate in anything; practice makes perfect. Simply being born literate is something that just doesn’t happen. To become literate in anything, a person has to try and work towards it. As much as we want it to, literacy doesn’t happen overnight. If someone wants to become literate in science and teach it to others, they have to study and work hard at it to ensure they have learned all they can. And persistency is what it truly takes to become a literate person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vivian,
      I agree everyone has a certain topic they are more literate in then most people like you—and me some—in theater while others might be literate in biochemistry or the like. I agree practice helps to improve and develop your understanding plus it really doesn’t happen overnight. We have several similar thoughts, especially that what we become literate in topics we strive to understand. Literacy is mostly the idea that is achieved when understanding is accomplished in a certain topic. Yes, literacy is the ability to read, write, speak etc. but it also expands much deeper into more complex thoughts and ideas.
      Amber

      Delete
    2. I'm would have to disagree with you Vivian. It seems to me you are mixing several different terms to create your definition. Not to say that your judgment is wrong, however, you seem to focus more on the connotation that the word literate carries. This makes the definition of the literate very ambiguous. Which is not a bad thing, the English language is beautiful because of its ability to be vague and poetic. However, you must take into account that the intentions of words are to express exact emotions and concepts. That is the purpose of communication after all. If all terms were ambiguous that would just be bad conveyance. There is a time and a place for poetic meaning and deeper meaning, and I believe it’s important to be able to analyze this. Yet I believe it’s more important to clearly define a word. Without this all written and spoken language would be almost meaningless. An interesting concept, by expanding the possibility of different meaning you lose significance.

      Delete
    3. Vivian,
      I particularly enjoyed reading your post because it was similar to mine. I loved your point about the "street smarts" and the stuff about the sports and theater. I believe that you are correct. Everyone has their own area of expertise. Just because someone cannot read or write does not mean that they are not literate. That person may have a special skill such as hunting, or something that makes this person literate in their own way. I used in my post the example of Huckleberry Finn. Huck was not able to read because of his father's hatred for education. However, Huck was able to make his own conclusions and learned to live on his own, making him literate.

      Delete
    4. Vivian,
      Your thoughts on literacy match my own personal opinion almost perfectly. I believe that every person is literate in some way and no one is ever completely illiterate. Also, I also agree with you when you said it is all about practice. In this day and age people expect everything to be handed to them on a silver platter, but hard work is always needed to achieve your goals. I loved the way you inserted your own personal story into the post because not only was I able to understand your opinion on literacy but I also had the chance to learn a little more about you which is always interesting.

      Delete
    5. Vivian,
      I completely agree with your statement "I think it is also possible to be literate in many different ways and that literacy expands into many different fields and forms." I am very sports literate, however, I am not literate at all when it comes to theater. Also, I agree that practice helps you to understand things better. In order to get where you want to be these days working hard snd being persistent are two of the best ways to get there. I enjoyed reading the different types of literacies you mentoned, it opened my mind to all the different types of literacies there actually are.

      Delete
    6. Vivian

      I agree with you to a certain degree. I think there is a very basic form of literacy, reading and writing, and that if you do not meet those qualifications, you can flat out be called illiterate. But I do think you can expound upon that basic form and create a new sense of literacy from that. And that is where I agree with you on the different forms but I believe it to be in a different fashion.

      Delete
  12. Vivian,
    I like some of the types of literacies you mention here; it shows that you can imagine the depth that literacies imply. And absolutely--it's always about practice. That's really what AP Lit is all about. Foster says this too!
    Mac

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Literate as defined by Webster’s collegiate dictionary is "able to read and write" (when used as an adj.). So in regards to the prompt, the only two qualities a person needs to be considered literate is the ability to read and write. That's it. Being knowledgeable has nothing to do with the state of being literate. It maybe a side effect, however, a literate person can be and often is ignorant. As a result all modern, learned men are literate, but not all literate men are learned. Contrary to many of the posts of my peers I do not feel that being literate is more than being able to read and write.
    However, I do understand the connotation that is attached to the term literate is more than that. Educated, cultured, scholarly these are a few of the words connected to being literate and as a result literate men are often defined by those qualities. Due to this the distinction between these qualities and being literate are blurred, and they are viewed as one in the same. So as a result if I were to call a man literate, some may be inclined to believe said man is cultured or well-read. When in all actuality I only mean to say he has the ability to read and write in one language or another. I’m sure some of my peers are going to respond to me in some generic way by saying being literate is so much more than just reading and writing that it’s about breathing life into words. I respectfully disagree. Being literate is a symptom of being knowledgeable, not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrew,
      I believe our ideas and interpretation of the term, "literacy" are very much alike. I'm pleased to see someone express their perspective closely related to the exact definition rather than venturing too far from its literal meaning. Opening up with a definition from a credible source was spectacular and I applaud you! I love how you address our fellow peers about the definition and enjoyed reading how you so eloquently conveyed your point of view. I believe we must not over think our studies in order to simply sound more intellectual, and I think you accurately defined literacy while still sounding very well educated, as you are.

      Delete
    2. I am quite glad to know that I am not the only one who prefers the literal meaning over the philosophical. It seems that many like to interpret literacy based on their own experience with the term. This is not a negative thing, however, the question "What is Literacy" is not an opinionated question. The rest of the prompt is, but in relation to the first question, there is a correct answer. I do find it interesting how many of our peers find literacy to be the act of forming and understanding concepts. Perhaps the term is evolving in meaning, which is so common of living languages. Still, until the word is officially changed or amended in the dictionary I whole heartedly support my interpretation of literacy. I also am happy that you understand the importance of having clearly defined terms, without which proficient communication could not and would not exist.

      Delete
    3. Andrew,

      The passage above conveyed your ideas well; your stance is clear and backed up with well thought out points. With that being said, I simply disagree with you. I have been a student of the English language for a little while now, and I have come to the realization that words are ever evolving entities. Their definitions change, grow and multiply. That is one of the many beauties of living languages. Simply because the definition you provided is from Webster’s dictionary does not make it the only message the word literacy can evoke. If people understand a concept differently, it does not make their definition wrong.

      Delete
    4. Andrew,

      You are correct when you say that Webster's collegiate dictionary defines literate as "able to read and write". However, you fail to include the other definition that is also mentioned. Webster's also defines literate as "having knowledge or competence". Therefore, there are two correct answers to the first part of this prompt. Also you state, "Being knowledgeable has nothing to do with the state of being literate", but then you go on to say "being literate is a symptom of being knowledgeable", so which do you believe? Your post, although with a clear central belief, seems to be a bit inconsistent at points.

      Delete
    5. Ching,

      I agree with you when you stated "the only two qualities a person needs to be considered literate is the ability to read and write." Because although pretty much everyone has their own opinion, by definition what is stated above is true. Reguardless of what anyone thinks or says by true definition that's all it is. The ability to read and write, nothing more, nothing less. Which brings me to "a literate can be and often is ignorant" I also agree with this statement. Think of some of the people you know that can read and write that are still considered literate.

      Delete
    6. Mr. Ching,

      So what your saying Andrew is that people unkownlingly percieve literate people to be posing of certian qualities or traits like cultured or well-read" and it is from this false perception people have that they create a blurry definition of what it truely means to be literate. According to you to be literate all a person has to have is "the ability read and write" so if a person is unable to do said things then they are an illiterate. Writing and reading are forms of expression. Expression can be performed through different mediums such as art, music,etc. I have to disagree. I believe in order for one to be literate all they need to be able to do is express themselves through anything beyond themselves. Reading and Writing are higher forms of expression because traditionaly these mediums have been inaccessable to the common people until institution came about to meet this demand for higher forms of expression, higher learning if you will.

      Delete
    7. Andrew,
      I enjoyed reading your response, and in a sense I actually agree with you. However, there is a major part of language itself that you fail to account for. In psychology, we studied language at length, and the most important thing to remember about words is that they have no inherent meaning. The meaning we give words is perceived, meaning that is a group perceives that what we know as a table is called a "chair" then they are also correct. Dictionaries are useful tools to gain rough understandings of words and meanings, but they often fail to account for deeper, sub-textual meanings and connotations. As a result, the definition of "literate" is "able to read and write," but it has connotations that give it greater meaning (specifically, the added level of "comprehension"). The connotations cannot be discarded, because they are part of individuals' understandings of the term.

      Delete
  15. Literacy, for our purposes, means much more than the ability to look at words on a page and know what they say (although that is a skill that some people do not possess at all). Most basically, the word does mean to read and write. But for us, literacy includes the ability to understand the meaning behind those words and how that meaning relates to our lives. We are scholars who study great literature; simply knowing the words will not suffice; we must determine what the author's message really is. The author’s message is, for us, the most important part of any writing, not simply the actual words he uses. Authors employ symbols and other devices that describe ideas in nonliteral ways. If we were to read a text without realizing the symbolism, then we could not understand the author’s message. Therefore, we would not be literate because, for us, literacy is not only understanding the words but also understanding their meaning. In order to become literate in that sense, one must read constantly. In the same way that words usually mean the same thing wherever they are written, symbols often represent the same thing in different texts. Symbolism in literature is a less concrete language, but a language nonetheless. It is in that language that we must become literate. This literacy will open our eyes to a hidden world of knowledge. We will discover hidden ideas within books we previously thought to be elementary. We will be exposed to new ideas within books that were unreadable before. Once we truly become literate, we will be free and able to read about much more complicated ideas about everything. And once we have read about those ideas, we will be able to write about them ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  16. According to www.dictionary.com, being literate means having the “ability to read and write” (…obviously). Additionally, to me, it means having at least a basic appreciation and understanding of literature. It means being able to identify the most famous, important, and/or influential pieces of writing of all-time (“The Bible”, works by William Shakespeare, “Alice In Wonderland“, etc…), most of which are discussed in “How To Read Literature Like A Professor“. It means being able to apply pre-existing knowledge to a piece of literature to enhance one’s understanding of the text. Finally, it means being able to comprehend writing at a level above the literal sense.

    If one reads George Orwell’s “Animal Farm”, for instance, and takes it at face-value, they may possess the ability to read and be literate in the general sense of the term, but may not be “AP Lit literate.” What is a simple story of talking farm animals to them is a hard-hitting political allegory to those who know better… those who are truly literate. Being able to recognize and decipher symbolism and parallels is one of the true marks of someone who possesses literacy.

    A literate person appreciates and understands the classic works of literature. As Foster explains in “How to Read Literature Like A Professor,” totally original writing is virtually nonexistent. Everything, whether intentionally or not, is based off of some other text. Someone who is literate understands this fact and is able to identify the basic origins of a piece of writing. An appreciation for all types and sub-genres of literature can greatly contribute to this asset.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luke, I love that you brought up "Animal Farm" as an example. This was one of the first pieces I read where I was forced to really go in depth and become "literate," even if only for that story. Similar to many other novels and stories, "Animal Farm" is a story that could be a great children's story if just read for the words on the page. However, that was not what it was intended for and only a literate person could see that there was more and take grasp on the author's purpose. The average person misses out on a lot of things in reading by only skimming the surface. If one did reread and study a text then they would bring themselves into a whole new world of understanding and idea. For that reason, I believe that being literate is a decision, not a God given ability.

      Delete
  17. Literacy is not simply the ability to read and write; it is the complete understanding of a subject, along with using said subject as an art form. A person can obtain literacy in any artistic concentration. Simply reading a word and knowing how to write it, or reading a musical note and poking it with your index finger on a piano is, in itself, useless. But understanding the language of music and using that knowledge to taking in the pure beauty of a musical masterpiece makes a person literate in a musical sense. Having the ability to understand an author’s prose or poetry, while taking in its symbolism and allusions, giving you the chance to be truly moved by their work, is being literate in the subject of literature. More simply said, literacy is the ability to take a subject’s language and use it to create and take in beauty.
    Bearing that in mind, it must be remembered that a person does not have to be a skilled musician, a gifted painter or have a great ability to decipher deep meanings within all written texts to be literate in those subjects; there are very few in this world that do. One does, however, have to have some sort of an understanding in their own subject’s language and use. Without this basic understanding and ability, words have the same rudimentary use as early forms of hieroglyphics, music is reduced to meaningless noise, drawing is belittled to graphite and paper, and literacy cannot be obtained.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I firmly believe that literacy is the ability to form conscious thoughts in a way that is both intelligent and relevant. A sign of literacy in an individual is the tact to think “quick” on the draw, which shows the immediate indication of thought. Even a stream of consciousness enveloped with nonsense, if thought through intelligently, is a strong example of literacy.

    The foundation of literacy begins at home. Without a steady flow of proper language and sentence structure influencing a child from the very beginning of life, the growth of literacy cannot continue past infancy. The fact remains, however, that a child will also choose whether they will obey the “laws” of literacy that have been implemented in their home, assuming that the parents or guardians don’t have awful grammar. If that’s the case, then there is almost no hope for a constant growth of literary knowledge.

    Once a person reaches a certain age, they simply will not absorb the fundamental elements of proper grammar, speech, sentence structure, tense, or any other literary device for the matter. The saying: “You can’t teach and old dog new tricks” applies to this in that once the person isn’t young anymore, the lust for new knowledge is lost in the wind.

    But for those who have stuck out the educational marathon of the English language, the implementation of literacy is automatic and not a necessary lesson. Those who are literate think about anything they want, for they can visualize it not only in their heads, but on paper and again on their tongues. Literate people do what they please for they can understand the consequences-positive or negative-of their actions. That is why literacy is important now more than ever.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This term is one of those difficult words to define; it’s meaning stretches in several ways and though when we see it and understand describing the word is a challenge. So here I am going to hopefully succeed in breaking the term literacy into the various levels that I think describe it best.

    The outer shell of this term, for me, is the ability to read, absorb, understand, and articulate an opinion on a text. Then there comes a comprehension of those readings and writings on multiple levels, be it an emotional, an analytical, or an even deeper level of understanding. Someone who is literate also possesses full knowledge in a subject; knowledge using the same qualities required in the last definition. Delving farther into what literacy means one can look at society, and people in general. There is a respectability that comes from being literate and then there is an ability to assess the pitfalls and beauties of society. Perhaps when one finds full literacy in a subject one thinks and refers to the subject continually, their knowledge and the prospect of furthering their knowledge just fills them up. To connect the continual knowledge and love of knowledge gained through being literate to one’s society in a deeper way truly enriches all aspects of life. Literature itself does all of this; as a mass of many different texts it examines human life, their experiences, and their feelings on many levels using many varied mental tools. So reading and fully exploring the facets of written literature is a means of employing literacy.

    It is living and sponging up as much information as possible that give someone the chance to be literate. If there is no desire in a person to learn or to continually seek out knowledge then they do not possess the tools it takes to find literacy. Having respect for one’s own mental strengths and knowing one’s voice gives an insight that can connect readings and studies to the greater world. So to become literate person it takes practice and passion, time and effort, and possession of the skills in basic literacy and its deeper counterparts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thoroughly enjoy your basic definition of literacy, specifically the aspects of absorbing and articulating an opinion on a text. What good come of the ability to read if one does not absorb the information they are reading or cannot form their own opinion on it? Without using these pillars one would be wasting a precious gift. In Hamlet, young hamlet makes a comment that a man who does not use his god given gifts is no better than a beast.
      I absolutely love your idea of various levels of literacy and agree with it 110%. In my response to this prompt I attempted to describe a similar idea but I like how you break it down into a clear understanding.

      Delete
  20. Literacy is a term that on the surface could simply be described as the ability to read and write. However, there are many deeper levels to literacy and to being a literate person. Literacy, is a word kind of similar to love, in that each person sees it differently and puts their own definition to it. So in my perspective, literacy is not just having the ability to read a text or write a paper, but the understanding it takes to travel into the depths of a piece and also give depth to their own writing. For instance, like mentioned in "How to Read Literature like a Profesor," the Bible is a book that contains passage after passage of texts with endless meaning. However, the average person would just read each chapter and see it as an interesting story, but a literate person would read each passage (probably reread each passage) and see that they aren't just stories but metephors and guidelines for life. A literate person will always go deeper.
    A literate person is also someone who is emmersed into literary pieces. They have read timeless classics like the ones mentioned in "How to Read Literature like a Professor" (the Bible, Shakespeare, etcs.) Not only have they read the pieces but they have studied them and could have an intelligient conversation about any part of each piece. A literary person doesn't just start a novel planning to read it and get the gist, they plan to study it and get inside the mind of the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Molly,

      I agree with your statement, “A literate person will always go deeper.” Literate people see the deeper meaning behind the text and never view parts of a passage insignificant. Instead of skimming over parts of writings they see no value in, they study the author’s purpose for it until they discover the profounder meaning. For example, Steinbeck spends an entire chapter describing a turtle’s struggle while crossing a road. At first I saw no point in this part of the book, but later realized how it exemplified the many struggles families, including the Joads, experienced during this time. Literate people do go deeper into the text, study it, and understand its purpose.

      Delete
    2. The idea that everyone has a different idea of literacy is very striking. While most people writing these blogs agree that literacy includes finding a deeper meaning within a text, what that deeper meaning is varies for each person. My life experiences and literary experiences are very different from everyone else. Thus my interpretation of a text will be different from all others. Foster claims that readers do not read and that writers do not write in a vacuum. We bring with us all our past experiences with literature and life, which are different for all people. Differing opinions on certain issues would also bring about a different interpretation of a text.

      Delete
  21. Literacy: (1) The ability to read and write. (2) Competence or knowledge in a specified area. Literacy is knowing and being able to understand something, many think of reading and writing. In today's day in age, a person must know how to read and write. Otherwise they could not do simple tasks like cooking by a recipe, driving, high education, giving directions to a certain street. Reading not only opens up the everyday world, but any other world you wish to see. Any book, blog, archive, newspaper, could allow a person to leave the life they live just for a bit and can come back whenever the please. Writing is allowing to speak with words, which could probably be one of the most powerful messages other than speaking.

    Literacy is living.

    A few centuries ago, the amount of illiterate people was extremely higher. If a person couldn't afford education, they would just have basic knowledge. Slaves were not allowed to be educated, and we all know about the stories about newly-freed slaves trying to survive in the world without reading or writing. It wasn't as important to everyone. Wealthier people could afford education and the gift of reading. Others main focus was food. As time progressed, the general public learned everyday words like "store" and "food" because it was a part of their daily routine. The art of practicing, I believe, is the best way to become literate. Anyone could do it, they just have to be taught a certain way.

    Practice is the key to literacy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lauren,
      You make a fantastic point when you describe literacy as living. The idea of literacy stemming from experience is an intriguing way of viewing the concept. I agree that anyone is able to develop into a more literate person through persistent practice and the gradual learning process. Knowledge can be discovered anywhere, allowing one to gain more understanding every day. One must only embrace learning and open one’s mind to new ideas in order to become more literate. Life itself is an education, and through the struggles and successes of one’s own experiences, one will inevitably evolve into a more enlightened person.

      Delete
    2. As I was skimming all of these blogs and just scrolling down the page, the same phrase Audrey enjoyed just jumped out at me. Out of the dozens and dozens of solid blocks of text that compose all of the blog entries for this particular prompt, those three words, “Literacy is living,” attracted my eyes like the gravitational field of a black hole. Once I read them, I had no idea what was going on but I was quite fascinated by the potential prospects for a definition of them so I back-tracked in order to read your entire post.

      And Audrey’s right; that is fantastic! When I think about literacy, I restrict it solely to dealing with matters of reading, writing, and expression through literary mediums. But what you say really makes sense to me. If I’m not mistaken, you are asserting that, as practice is the key to literacy, literacy is the key to doing just about anything, via reading and writing. Reading instructions, pouring over manuals, even communicating with others over text messages and e-mails: these are all ways we use literacy to interact with the world and unlock its secrets for our personal benefits and continued ways of life.

      I like your way of thinking.

      Delete
  22. Literacy, according to Merriam Webster, is the ability to read and write, but I believe the concept of literacy extends far beyond that into the comprehension of what one reads. Without comprehension of what one is reading, reading simply becomes the pronunciation of words. To be literate, to me, means to be able to read, write, comprehend what you read. I also think being literate means being able to respond, on various levels, to what you read.

    One becomes literate, from the dictionary’s stance, by learning phonics and definitions of words. But to truly become literate, requires questioning what you read and thinking about if it can apply to things in life. If it can apply to things in life, what will it mean to you, the reader? Being literate not only means questioning and finding application, but also means comparing what one comprehends across multiple mediums of literature and text.

    A literate person does the aforementioned. They question what they read, they connect it to their lives, and they find application for what they learn from reading. A literate person, on an “abstract” level, knows that they should practice these things. On a literal level, a literate person should strive to know as much as they can. Besides responding to reading, one should retain what they read. Reading is useless if you don’t learn any concrete facts. A literate person thinks outside of the box. Actually, a literate person has no box. A literate person thinks to find meaning in text.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The term Literacy has evolved from " the ability to read and use printed materials at an extremely basic level" to " using printed and written information to function in society, to achieve one's goals and to develop one's knowledge and potential" (2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy). Literacy stands for more than simply being able to read and write. Literacy allows people to take their experiences and apply them into their everyday readings and writings. Being literate requires people to think "outside the box" and understand not only the text they are reading but also how to apply that knowledge into real life actions. However, it is my opinion that everyone is literate in their own way. A perfect example of this opinion would be 'The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn'. Huck's father disapproved of his education therefore caused Huck to be illiterate to everyone around him. However, Huck was a very intelligent person and was forced to survive on his own in the absence of his father. Huck was able to gather information and make his own conclusions. This prime example proves that even though Huck was uneducated, he was still literate in his own mind and through the decisions and conclusions he drew.

    A person becomes literate in many ways. Reading and Writing about literature works and important classical novels only deepens the knowledge and takes the literacy to a new level. However becoming literate can be as simple as seeing or hearing someone say something and being able to respond to them. It is my opinion that if a person simply holds conversation with someone, they build their vocabulary and become more literate. Every person has their own topic of literacy. A literate person is able to take what they know and use it in real situations. For example, a hunter once heard a new way to make fire. Being literate, he is able to take that knowledge and make the fire. A literate person compiles tiny pieces of information and makes a puzzle out of the pieces. This puzzle shows information and literacy coming together as a whole piece by piece. A person is never fully literate, but is always adding to the puzzle of literacy.

    ReplyDelete
  24. To fully define a word such as literacy in every form it can possess would take up much more space on a page than I would be willing to write. Therefore, I will attempt to compose an abbreviated working definition of what literacy is. Literacy, like an onion, has many contiguous layers to it. Based on the situation literacy could mean anything from the common ability to read and write to an adjective describing one's proficiency with a potato gun. The latter example is a more uncommon usage of the word, nonetheless it is correct. In a dictionary, I found the proverbial definition of literacy as the ability to read and write. However, in the same dictionary was another definition of the word; to have knowledge or skill in a specified field.
    This truth led me to believe that every person who has applied themselves in some way is in a sense literate. This is fascinating to me, because contrary to my old belief, one does not even have to know how to read and write to be considered literate. All a person has to do is pick up some knowledge or skill, whether it be as simple as throwing a baseball or as complex as having the knowledge to create a proof about Fermat's last theorem.
    All humans have the capability to be literate, and people become literate through knowledge or application. What a literate person does, knows, and thinks based on this interpretation of the word literacy is diverse considering everyone has the capability to be literate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nate,
      Your definition of literacy is quite close to my own. We both believe that literacy is having knowledge in a single area and that everyone has the chance to be literate even those who are poor. We also both think that one must apply themselves to become literate. I enjoyed the fact that you shared with us the fact that before defining the word literacy you believed it was only the ability to read or write. It showed that you actually gained something from writing this blog. Also, I liked the examples you used when explaining how people who cannot read can indeed be literate. You used simple examples (like throwing a baseball) to show that everyone is literate.

      Delete
    2. I am glad to see that someone has a very similar understanding and belief about literacy. I too see literacy as an onion with many layers. I described my own definition using the “onion theory.” I agree with Sydney as well, it’s nice that you mention your previous thoughts on literacy; it allows another level of connection for the readers. I, myself, used to think that to be classified as literate one had to posses the ability to read and write.

      Delete
  25. I believe there is more to literacy than the ability to read. More importantly, literacy is the ability to comprehend what you read and write in an eloquent and grammatically correct way. But even more than that, also having a wide-ranging set of knowledge. By this I mean, knowing a little about a lot and always being eager to learn. In my opinion, literacy is determined on a person’s open-mindedness and expertise in many subjects rather than simply their ability to read and write. Many people are aware of what words say; however, the difference between literacy and illiteracy is knowing what they mean. Literacy is the ability to not just write basic words but to express them in a way that challenges, intrigues, and captures the reader’s attention.

    As I thought about literacy more and what it means to be “literate” I kept going back to how the people of Appalachia were once known as illiterate people and still struggle with this stereotype. Why is that? Growing up in West Virginia shielded its inhabitants to a variety of knowledge due to the encompassing mountains and sheltered life style. It wasn’t that these people were incapable of reading a book or writing a sentence, but were shielded in the sense that they were not exposed to different ideas, customs, people, literature, and etc. Therefore, were considered illiterate due to their lack of knowledge in a variety of topics by the outside world. By reading and learning about a multiplicity of subjects, one broadens their knowledge and becomes more tolerant of unfamiliar cultures, philosophies, languages, and so on, while also becoming literate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am very intrigued with your views concerning literacy and illiteracy. In my post I did not even touch on the deeper meanings of literacy, but instead took a very concrete, basic approach. You however, apply the concept of being well-cultured as the best approach to become a literate person. This meaning, in your own words, " knowing a little about a lot". This view on literacy contradicts my own post, however as I said earlier there are many contiguous layers to literacy and your explanation just happens to be closer to the core of the onion than mine. I also enjoyed reading your explanation of why West Virginia citizens are considered to be "illiterate" by other citizens; it was very enlightening. P.S. I am doing this on an iPhone at football camp so I apologize for any misspellings or grammatical errors.

      Delete
  26. Literacy is not easily confined to a single definition. Some may describe it as a proficiency in reading and writing, while others may measure it by the breadth of one’s book collection. But these are both fairly shallow explanations understating literacy’s true meaning. In order to genuinely understand the concept, one must probe further beneath the surface. Literacy is much more comprehensive than the basic functions one learns in school. One may read and write sufficiently but still not possess true literacy. Literacy stretches beyond these basic abilities, encompassing knowledge on a much greater scale. In order to be a truly literate person, one must immerse oneself in learning and dig further beneath the surface for a deeper understanding. Literacy requires one to think rather than just do; a literate person will not only complete the basic functions required of him or her, but will also gain new insight from the experience. It is easy to read a book, however, finding meaning within the words is not always so clear. This is a crucial step towards literacy; one must read deeper beneath the lines and comprehend on a more profound scale. This is the case not only with reading literature, but also with all forms of learning. One may achieve literacy in math or science or any subject one chooses to study. The key to literacy is simply education—gaining as much knowledge as possible in any given area. As one learns and develops skills, one grows more literate in the process, thus becoming more knowledgeable of the surrounding world. Because literacy stems from education, a literate person is constantly evolving, becoming more and more insightful as time goes on. There is never an end to the learning process; therefore, as one continues to gain more knowledge and experience throughout one’s life, literacy will come naturally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Audrey,

      I fully agree with your take on literacy and how to become literate. Like you said, “The key to literacy is simply education.” By broadening one’s knowledge and life experience, one becomes more literate. Literacy is not based so much on your ability to read and write, but more so how far you go with these skills. You acquire literacy by immersing yourself in a variety of topics and learning about them on a deeper level than expected. I really appreciated your statement, “Literacy requires one to think rather than just do; a literate person will not only complete the basic functions required of him or her, but will also gain new insight from the experience." Literate people exceed what is required of them and are not satisfied until they have learned something new.

      Delete
    2. Audrey,

      I completely agree with how you described literacy and how to become literate. One obtains literacy by immersing himself or herself in various topics and comprehending them on a deeper level than before. I also agree that "there is never an end to the learning process...as one continues to gain more knowledge and experience throughout one's life, literacy will come naturally." I truly enjoyed your reading your view on literacy.

      Delete
  27. According to www.merriam-webster.com being literate means one is able to read and write. Therefore literacy would mean the quality or state of having the ability to both read and write. A literate person is said to be an educated or a cultured person, one who has knowledge or competence. An example would be "She is literate in both English and Spanish." Meaning she can read and write in both the languages of English and Spanish.

    For one to become literate I believe it does not just come naturally, at first. I believe becoming literate is a process. Literacy skills build and grow a little at a time. Although for every person developing and attaining literacy skills will be different. Some becoming literate quicker than others. Starting with simply learning to count, and also learning the alphabet allowing one then to learn to add and read. These are just the beginning steps to becoming a literate person.

    A literate person has the ability to express different words and phrases in a way that provides literary merit. One that also reads and learns abouth the many different subjects always able to increase their knowledge by the way they attain any information. One who becomes aware of unfamiliar philosophies and languages. Like many other subject fields education is the key to literacy. A literate person thinks of gaining as much possible knowledge in any given area. Developing any possible skill while also becoming literate in the process, and in that process always finding meaning in a text.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Summer,
      I agree with your definition of literacy but I am also curious if you think it only applies to the ability to read. This is definitely the most common use of the term but I do not think it is the only use. According to the New Oxford American Dictionary literacy is competence or knowledge in a specific area. So, knowing how to kick a soccer ball for instance would mean you are literate in soccer. Literacy is basically another word or way for a person to say that they are skilled and knowledgeable in a certain subject. However, the way you describe how literacy is accomplished is exactly what I thought.

      Delete
    2. Summer,
      I completely agree with what you say on literacy and the levels it can contain. I like that you included how literacy does not come naturally at first but is a process. I did not think of this until I read your response to this prompt, but do you think people might be more prone of might have more of a talent to be a certain type of literate. Just like people have different types of personalities of the Myer-Brigg’s personality tests, or a biological or psychological aspect, maybe some people are genetically programmed or raised in a certain way for them to be more literate in certain areas. I am really caught up this different types of literacy idea, mainly because I had never thought about it before this book and all of these blogs.

      Delete
  28. Literacy is the ability to read and write. Would we count three year olds with Dr. Seuss books as literate? Under this definition, yes. A more appropriate definition, however, is one who is skilled at reading and writing and who can think beyond the words of a text. To become literate under this definition, one must do more than just learn to read. One must be a voracious reader, a connoisseur of books. One must write often, and one must write a lot. Quantity is not the point. It is the exposure. Experience provides the materials for one's mind. Even the smartest man cannot build the pyramids without stone.

    Exposure is not the only stop on the path to becoming literate. The books cannot be terrible. If a person reads only bad writing, they will never know what good writing is. The person's writing must be critiqued and later improved upon. Most often the writer will never notice his or her own mistakes. It takes another.

    These are the things that it takes to become literate, but they are not really what literacy is. Even the second definition provided above does not cover it. Literacy is the ability to communicate effectively. It involves the ability to read and understand a text. Literacy includes all aspects of reading from understanding the direct meaning of the words to grasping the implied concepts and repercussions of those words. In the realm of writing (and speaking), literacy is the ability to communicate ideas effectively. One must be able to translate the foggy realm of thought into unshakable words. Again, literacy is the ability to communicate, both sending and receiving. To do this, one must be exposed to the way others perceive the world. A literate person is open to these ideas and understands how to manipulate them to convey his own ideas in the way of another. A literate person compares constantly and, as a result, saves money on car insurance. Literate people think and have the knowledge and experience to put those thoughts to good use.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "What is literacy?" Literacy is, by definition, "the ability to read and write." However, like many words in the English language, it has deeper sub-meanings that no dictionary can hope to display. For example, if you were to ask ten people what it means to "be literate" you would get ten wildly different responses (take this very prompt as an example). As such, I would say that the definition of literacy (as with nearly any other word) must be carefully put, and that not every person will agree with the one I set. My definition for literacy is "the comprehension of a given subject" As a result, if I were asked "Are you literate?" I would have to reply "In what?"

    "What does it mean to be a literate person?" is a difficult question, to which the simplest answer is "Normality." I believe that there are a variety of literacies, just as there are a variety of intelligences. I actually draw a large parallel between literacy and intelligence. One may well be literate in "classical literature," for instance, but not in "modern literature." Similarly, literacy extends beyond the realm of literature. I myself am quite literate in the workings of the typical star, for instance, though I am totally lost in an auto parts store. Therefore, I am literate in stars and illiterate in car parts. Similarly, the majority of people in the world are literate in many other things and totally illiterate in stars. This is why my answer is "Normality," because nearly everyone has one thing about which they know a great deal, and as a result nearly everyone is literate in something.

    "How does one become literate?" is a general question. The general answer is "Ask questions." To become literate in [subject] one must first have a question about [subject] and then seek an answer to his/her question. The questions and the answers on the road to literacy vary for different subjects.

    "What does a literate person do, know, think?" is another general question, but the answer to it is not so simple as "Ask questions." In fact, it's simpler. "Anything." Really. Nearly anyone is or can become literate in something. Any given person is able to do, know, or think any number of things, so the only true answer to this question is "Anything."

    ReplyDelete
  30. Being literate means to fully understand a concept whether it is the alphabet and the words the letters make (the most normal way the word literate is used) or the way the blood flows through the body. Both require knowledge, skill, and practice to achieve complete literacy.

    Now I believe there are different levels of literacy. While someone who knows basic knowledge of a subject (like a high school student in biology class) would be partially literate in biology a person who has had many classes and is specialized in the subject (for instance a biology major) is completely literate in subject.

    A person becomes literate with practice and persistence. Literacy is not handed to anybody on a silver platter. It must be achieved. However those who are literate may receive many benefits from it. For instance, those who know great deals about one specific subject, like brains, will be highly recognized and rewarded in that subject for their literacy.

    I do not think anyone on the earth is entirely illiterate. Everyone has talents and knowledge even if it is hidden. You might be partially literate in a subject matter but you are still literate. The key is finding what you are literate in and using that to better yourself, obtain a job, or make a future.

    Those who are literate completely literate in a subject know it and usually flaunt it. They know they are smart so they want everyone else to know as well. Those who are partially literate in a subject are the ones to watch. They usually do not know that they are literate and lack self-confidence. However, they will surprise you in their capacity to gain knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sydney,

      Your statement saying you believe there are different levels of literacy intrigued me. I agree with this belief and think that depending on how experienced and knowledgeable one is, the more literate they are as well. The difference between our posts, however, is that I believe it should be based on how much ones knows in multiple subjects while you believe it is based on being specialized in a specific one. Either way, we can both agree that literacy comes with acquiring more knowledge, practice, and tenacity. Literacy is something that people work for and achieve. There is always room for improvement, but without the drive and eagerness to continue learning new things…no progress will be made.

      Delete
  31. Before reading How to Read Literature like a Professor, I would have defined literacy in a broad definition of being able to read and write. After reading the book however, I won’t ever look at the term literacy (or anything dealing with literature for that matter) in the same way. I guess a person could be literate in many different areas if you go by the book’s idea. One becomes literate by becoming educated in that certain area. We often think of this in the form of literature and language, and therefore only associate literacy with the meaning of knowing how to read and write. What does a literate person, do, know, and think? I would consider Thomas Foster a literate person in the area, of well, literature. So like a characteristic of the book, I’m sure Foster is a very analytical person that knows this area well. Because Thomas Foster is specialized in this area his actions, and thoughts are also probably heavily influenced by this. I also imagine someone literate in another area such as architecture might also do, know, and think in an analytical yet different way, maybe more with spatial perception.

    P.S. (yes, I added a post script to my blog) I just found out that the root word “lit” means letters, and that’s why literal, literacy, literature, alliteration, transliteration, and more all have to do with language. Am I the only one that has overlooked this? If so, then I’m kind of embarrassed.

    ReplyDelete
  32. There are multiple ways of defining "literacy", but all its definitions revolve around the simple concept: to be able to read and respond; communicate. We generally just think of literacy pertaining to text, but there is a much greater meaning to "read" and "respond". To be literate, one must be able to observe the surface while simultaneously digging for meaning; likewise, in a verbal conversation, a literate person does not only understand another's words, but also comprehends their body language and combine the two for the most accurate interpretation. Then, a literate person would be able to create an appropriate response which best fits the situation (setting, topic, emotional atmosphere, and person with whom shares the conversation). The same goes for text. When reading, a literate person may read the surface, the plain words, but is aware that that is not all. They search and hope for allusions, conspicuous allegories, trying (but not forcing) to build a relationship with the characters/and/author. One rudimentary method of delving deep into a text (whether in literature or scientific text) is to question the author's motives. What is there purpose? What message are they trying to communicate?

    Like everything, literacy requires practice and pushing oneself into the "further". No, not like in the movie Insidious, but beyond one's comfort zone. Sure its easy to fy through a book to simply enjoy an entertaining plot or story, but to be considered "one with literacy", one must be willing to dive head first into the unknown of the book. That is where we find the richness of the text, and that is where one will find oneself discovering literacy.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Literacy is defined as the quality or state of being literate, especially the ability to read and write. Most basically it means possessing the ability to read and write. One can look at the definition and retort with “but it so much more than that, it’s the ability to comprehend the text.” The definition of the word “read” however is to look at and comprehend the meaning of written or printed matter. Therefore literacy is literally the possession of basic education.

    Many readers may be thinking that I am dull in my response do to my one level definition. Though I think it is strictly the definition after reading How to Read Literature Like a Professor I believe Shrek’s “onion theory” can easily be applied. Simply put see literacy in layers.

    Literacy is commonly thought to only apply to reading and writing (before reading foster’s work I thought the same) but Foster shows that one can be literate in different and multiple subjects. Forster, for example, would be literate in literature and reading and writing.

    Being literate allows a person to exceed those who are illiterate for obvious reasons and that they are capable of translating their feeling into thoughts and Language, thereby producing meaning for those feelings. When one can give meaning they are able to form arguments for their beliefs and thoughts. Literacy creates a domino effect and it in this way that the literate can accomplish nearly anything (with the exception of physical limits.) How far the domino chain falls depends on the effort put forth to learn, continue learning, and put the literacy to use by each individual literate person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maddie,

      I completely agree with your statement that one can be literate in different and multiple areas. I explored this idea in my own blog post. However, I think it is am extremely valuable point to be brought up. An English Professor who may be able to understand the ins and outs of Shakespeare is very unlikely to understand binary code for example. The Professor would be literate in literature but illiterate in binary code. This is only one example, a person can be literate and illiterate at the same time; it simply depends on what subject is the focus of discussion. I think this is a very common idea throughout time; everyone has their strengths and their weaknesses.

      Delete
  34. By definition (found in Merriam-Webster dictionary), literacy means "The ability to read and write". However, after having read How To Read Novels Like A Professor, I believe their definition to be more profound. According to both the novel and the Oxford dictionary, literacy not only means the ability to read and write, but it also refers to competence or knowledge in a specified area.

    By this definition, one does not necessarily have to excel in literature comprehension in order to be literate. That being said, anyone with a complete understanding of any subject could be considered literate. In example, one who prematurely removed themselves from their post-middle school education could have vast knowledge of a vocation and still be considered as literate as one who instructs an English course at an ivy-league college. It is the amount of knowledge in comparison as apposed to the type of knowledge that matters; not necessarily quantity versus quality, but a combination of both could easily gauge one's level of literacy.

    One can become literate from both study and experience. A comforting fact about literacy is that once that skill is learned, you never really forget how to utilize it. The skills come through in almost any project the literate person may participate in. Humans use literacy as a tool in their daily lives to aid them in almost any situation whether they realize it or not. One could easily state that literacy is a vital part of the basic anthropology of human kind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Emily,

      I agree that a person can be literate in multiple areas, but i do not agree with the idea that being literate is to be learned in a certain area. I feel that to be literate in a subject you must be have the ability to communicate your ideas and emotions through the area you are learned in. You must be able to process the information you are taking in and then proceed to communicate your own take of said information as well. Simply knowing the words that you read and write is not the same as having the ability to make them carry meaning and philosophical weight.

      Delete
    2. Emily,

      I really enjoyed your idea of the combination of both quality and quantity to measure literacy. When I read this I immediately thought of what makes bands and artists bad, good, or great.

      When a band has quantity and no quality, they simply don't make it. We never hear these bad bands, so I can't give any unbiased examples (Creed and Drake).

      When a band has quality and no quantity they become the classic one-hit wonder. The "Who Let the Dogs Out?' and "Call Me Maybe" songs come to mind.

      However, when a band masters both quantity and quality they reach the status of great. These are the truly "literate" bands. The ones we will always remember: The Beatles, Bob Dylan, and Michael Jackson (to name a few).

      Delete
    3. Emily,

      I enjoyed what you wrote and agree with your idea of literacy being a combination of quality and quantity. However, I agree with what Billy said about being able to communicate your interpretation/ideas. Someone who is literate should be able to have a discussion/debate that is mentally stimulating. I personally believe that there are different levels/stages of literacy. Whether someone one is truly literate or not is not based on a single standard.

      Delete
  35. Literacy is a basic understanding of a certain subject or field. Once someone knows the very fundamental concepts of an area they become “literate.” However, like some posts have said before, there are many levels of literacy. Literacy has three stages: understanding, applying, and innovating.

    The very basic form of literacy is just the rudimentary understanding of the specific field. In the subject of reading and writing, this consists of knowing how the different combinations of letters form words that represent different objects or ideas. This would include children who can read the sentence, “a cow jumped over the moon,” and know that a cow jumped over the moon.

    As someone becomes more literate, they are able to use their knowledge and apply it to new situations. With reading and writing, this would be the ability to find the meaning beyond the story at face value. This includes a reader understanding that Animal Farm by George Orwell serves as more than just the story of farm animals, and tells the story of the Russian revolution.

    Someone with the highest level of literacy has the ability to use their understanding to innovate or enhance their specific field. In reading and writing, this could range anywhere from writing an original story to even proposing a new interpretation of a popular story. The people with the highest level of literacy add their own voice to the great discussion. For example, Albert Camus’ essay on Sisyphus that argued Sisyphus was happy rather than the idea he was living the ultimate peril completely changed the way people read the myth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jameson, I am in complete agreement with the three stages of literacy. In many of the other posts on this subject, some have claimed that there are different levels, but failed to elaborate on what those levels may be. I appreciate the further explanations of each level as well. Because of your post, I have become more literate of the meaning of literacy.

      Delete
  36. Literacy is generally defined as “the ability to read and write”, and that is the definition most commonly thought of when the word “literacy” comes up. However, being literate entails so much more than simply writing a sentence or reading a book, which brings me to the second, less common definition of literacy, “competence or knowledge in a specified area”. This second definition holds more true to our society’s view of literacy. We live in an ever-changing, ever-evolving, world where (sadly) books and tangible text are becoming more and more outdated everyday. Our generation has access to numerous types of new multimedia and different forms of expression. Our task is not simply to be able to interpret text anymore; it has evolved into the ability to think beyond the first glance, or first understanding through whatever format. In that way, literacy has remained unchanged throughout time; the mediums through which we interpret have changed.

    Additionally, I think there are different levels or types of literacy. For example, I am definitely not as literate as an English Scholar, but I am more literate than a first grader. However, as the scope changes, an English Scholar could be deemed nearly illiterate in scientific matters in comparison to a science professor. And from that, the science professor could be regarded as incompetent in understanding the technological media of our society as compared to a teenager like myself. No one is literate in all matters.

    With the different ranges of literacy, it is hard to set a specific path to literacy. Literacy is something that is developed as one moves through life. It is not something that can be learned in a matter of a few hours. Instantaneous development of literacy is an outlandish due to the inherent nature of literacy, which requires the beholder to have developed a level of it through various experiences and exposure to different types of not only literature, but multimedia as well.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Literacy by definition means to be able to read and write; however I believe literacy is being able to comprehend what you have read. To be literate is to have complete knowledge on multiple subjects or one specific subject. To become literate a person has to be patient and willing to become educated on a specific topic or topics.

    I believe it is possible to be literate on many different levels and in many categories. For example, someone can be sports literate like myself, meaning they understand a lot about different kinds of sports but, I am not as literate as say a sports medicine major. But, I don’t think it is possible for one person be completely literate in one subject or even in multiple subjects. For example, if one thinks they know a lot about computers there is probably still something they can learn therefore, they are not completely literate. I also believe people can be “illiterate” which means a person cannot read or write. However, I believe this is very rare and there has to be some form of literacy that one understands.

    A literate person strives to learn more about the topic or topics they are interested in. They do not just learn about one topic or topics for fun they plan to learn everything they possibly can and push themselves to become an expert. Once a person becomes literate they are able to use the information they have obtained to perhaps get a job or share their findings with others in order to help them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Braddick,
      You're expansion on literacy is very intriguing. I like how you suggest it is the knowledge and understanding of something, rather than the communication involved with that subject or object. I personally see literacy more as a status of communication: one who is literate is able to "read" and "respond"; communicate effectively. So now I'm considering including knowledge (as you suggest) within my definition. Everything requires knowledge or some experience to understand or be literate on that topic. I like how your definition applies to a broader spectrum as opposed to my narrow claim.
      Also, I would like to agree with your belief on the impossibility of ever becoming entirely "literate" within any or multiple subjects. There is, and always will be, something more to learn.

      Delete
  38. In order to accurately define being "literate" I think we must first look at a dictionary definition. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the term "literate" is defined as two things. First, "Educated, cultured" and second, "able to read and write." I must admit, before glancing at the definition It was my belief that being "literate" was merely the second given definition, (able to read and write). However, after reviewing my peers' posts and glancing at an another definition, I have understood and have realized being literate can mean much, much more.

    Being literate means understanding themes, motifs, and symbolism expressed by an author and knowing how to apply those skills in your own writing. As expressed in other posts, it is understanding various origins of writing. Signing up for AP Lit was a commitment and I knew that entering the course meant that I would be amongst the brightest, most intellectual, pupils of the entire school, facing rigorous challenges. Obviously, all that signed up for the course know how to read and write or else they would be incapable of completing these blog posts.

    To many, literacy strictly pertains to literature itself. However, people may also be literate in various fields of study. For example, if I majored in biochemistry, I could be considered literate in that field. However, like many other things, being literate is subjective, so that particular biochemist may not be considered literate through everyone’s point of view. Essentially, there is no set standard on literacy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luke,

      Your post really stands out to me simply because quite a few of the blog posts used the second definition you provided. Your alternative definition provides a fresh idea not many people have touched on: literacy does not necessarily pertain to literature.

      However, I find it hard to apply it to myself. By your definition, I am not exactly literate in anything. Are all children illiterate? In the US, literacy rates have been dropping dramatically in the past few years, and in a perfect world, we would be using your definition of literacy in this context. The ability to read and write seem fairly simple to me, yet most find it hard to apply what they have learned into their writing. There is definitely more to literacy than recognizing every letter of the alphabet.

      Delete
    2. To both Luke and, in part, Ellie,

      I really appreciate that you've presented both multiple definitions and the possibility of extending literary outside of its field. Like most things, literacy is relative and is highly subjected to personal opinion. Depending on whom you call on to define what's "literate", the percentages can be radically high or low.

      I feel inclined to bring to attention, however, that one generally would not say they were literate in math because we use the word numerate. Numeracy, like literacy, is very tricky because it's a base skill that quietly dominates most of our activities.

      Delete
  39. Literacy is defined as the ability to read and write. However, literacy is more than just simply being able to read and write but is also the ability to comprehend hidden meanings in texts. Literacy can also pertain to other aspects in life since there are varying degrees and types of literacy besides literature. For example, one can be literate in arts while another literate in sports.To be literate in literature, one should have knowledge pertaining to genres of literature as well, the subject of a text, and knowledge gained from life experiences. A literate person is someone who has read many works of literature and can discover hidden meanings in texts. One main key to being literate is being able to understand the context of a text.

    To become literate, one should surround himself or herself with knowledge. By surrounding yourself with knowledge, you will obtain a better understanding of a subject. This will help to further validate your point in a discussion. Literate people should not only challenge what they experience in their reading but also their personal experiences since much of what we come by in life involves a combination of acquisition and learning. Literate people should be open-minded and unbiased when discussing topics. A literate person uses both previous and new knowledge to further their own understanding and the understanding of others.

    ReplyDelete
  40. You can say that literacy has this deep, mystical meaning that one can achieve through years of training from a man on a mountain with a beard. My peers appear stuck on trying to find this deeper meaning of the term. While I am not discrediting any of them, I just feel that the answer is much simpler. In my opinion, literacy is simply being able to read and write, nothing more.

    Knowledge, scholar, cultured all tag along with this idea of literacy. Those do not make a man literate, for they only sharpen the knife of literacy causing it to be more affective. At birth, we are just raw material without much of a purpose. As time progresses, we get put to use, but first, we need to be taught the basics. Now, we have out basic function, which will remain for the rest of our lives. Now what we do with that function depends on us. Some might sit around and stay dull, some might use it to their advantage, some might spend their whole life perfecting it. No matter what we do with it, we are all the same, with the same basic function -- literacy. What adjective gets tagged along with it is up to you. So yes, literacy is simply the ability to read and write, how you expound upon that is up to you.

    ReplyDelete